i have another local machine set up as the "exposed" host for a development web server, so it's not a matter of "exposing" the fileserver.Īnyhow, the netatalk server is on .x (a local IP) and needs to be seen as our one real routable IP port 548 (at least to a couple of offsite employees). maybe "firewall" is a misnomer, but it works so far. I'm actually using IPNetrouter, which is doing both NAT and portmapping/filtering duties. If you use a good firewall like IPtables, you can also only "open up" that port for her (assuming she's got a stable IP address at home) and to that server. > Opening TCP port 548 will do it fine- Assuming the IP address of the netatalk server is a routable address and you're not NATing w/ the firewall, that is. >is the AFP port, but are there any others i need to open up as well?Īt 10:38 AM -0400 4/29/02, Matthew Keller wrote: >allow for AFP over TCP to get through? the material i have says 548 >the other thing, what ports do i need to open up on my firewall to >ideas, if any, on pitfalls to avoid, etc. >i think i can handle that part, but i'd like to get the group's >messages on that topic - how should i, ideally, configure my >to think about - and i'll probably have some choice words in future >forgetting, for the moment, the security measures i'm going to have >able to get to the file server and retreieve files, etc. ![]() >soon, and the thought is that it would be nice to have her still be >i have an employee here that is going to start working from home ![]() >i'm getting ready to delve into the wonderful world of VPNs - sorta. Stable IP address at home) and to that server.Īt 10:34 AM -0400 4/29/02, Charles Mangin wrote: If you use a good firewall like IPtables, youĬan also only "open up" that port for her (assuming she's got a Of the netatalk server is a routable address and you're not NATing w/ Opening TCP port 548 will do it fine- Assuming the IP address
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |